SearchSearch using pMachine
Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window - Steve Wozniak
Friday, October 30, 2009
Let it not be said that the Democrats are ignorant of the problems of malpractice suits:
I recently moved from Texas, which has the best malpractice environment, to Pennsylvania, which has one of the worst. The difference in physician availability and retention is stunning. We’ve had more problems finding doctors in ten months in Pennsylvania than we did in four years in Texas. It’s probably not all the punitive damage caps. But it certainly doesn’t hurt.
Now the Democrats want to undo this. That’s their idea of reform.
Kumar caught in a WH scandal?
It looks like even Kalpen Modi, a.k.a Kumar, ended up dirty when working for this WH. Guess that escape from Gitmo or that midnight run to White Castle after some heavy partying didn’t prepare em for the crap he would end up in. Seriously, isn’t there anyone that deals with these people and doesn’t end in trouble? Check it out:
Edmunds.com recently published an analysis of the Cash-for-Clunkers program, concluding that the economic impact was minimal. You know what comes next from the Least Confident Administration Ever.
They have a copy of the post, which reads like something I would write on a slow blog day. It’s snarky and sarcastic. Even worse, it’s snarky about something that ended months ago.
Why are these guy so thin
Posted by Hal_10000 on 10/30/09 at 04:28 PM in Politics Cult of Personality • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
About that economic recovery…
That economic news we got about how the recession is now over seems a bit premature. Especially when that claim came with all those “buts” attached. This number is drastically inflated by such things as the “Cash for Clunkers” and the
We even have the Foundation for Economic Education, publisher of the Distress Index, saying not so fast! And even worse, many are predicting the death of the dollar. Of course, the more I hear about this stuff, the more I wonder if the collectivists are doing what they are doing by design. Crash the system and reboot it the way they want it and all that. And with the media blatantly doing propaganda for the collectivsts and pretending all is well when it definitely feels and looks like it isn’t even close to that, who knows.
Posted by AlexinCT on 10/30/09 at 08:44 AM in Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Remember the bad old days during the Cold War of puppet regimes? Seems like what’s old is new:
The deal is that the military will be under control of the courts, not Zelaya.
I can’t express how disgusted with this I am. Zelaya was legally removed from office. His exile was probably illegal and the crackdown on pro-Zelaya newspapers certaintly was. But there is no way he should be returned to power. The man is no longer President. This was not a coup but a legal removal from office.
Zelaya claims that, in January, he will step down in favor of the new President. I’ll believe that when I see it. Exit quesiton: if Zelaya does not step down, will Obama react with the same vigor to which he reacted to his legal removal from office? After all, he’s been silent on Chavez and Ortega. Will we insist on open and fair elections? After all, we didn’t in Venezuela or Nicaragua.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 10/30/09 at 07:41 AM in Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Thursday, October 29, 2009
The government takeover of healthcare bill is so good…
That Nancy Pelosi has decided none of the peasants should bother to try and read it. Only for VIPs. Why the hell would anyone care what’s in that 1990 page abomination anyway? The government is going to fix it all and that’s all we need to know. Now shut up and give away more of your paycheck to your betters. And the left loves to tell us how bad Bush was. Obama and the demcorats have done more damage and stupid things in but 9 months than Bush id in 8 freaking years. And that’s saying something. Looks like Carter will soon be able to enjoy the title of “second worse president” after the current idiot.
Update: The CBO has chimed in on this new bill which not only keeps the death panels and the horrible government take over plan which started off as the “public option” and has been renamed a couple of times by Nancy Pelosi in the hopes of confusing people, but according to the CBO will cost over $1 trillion. What the CBO likely doesn’t mention are the massive increases in taxes - which will impact everyone paying insurance premiums right now for private plans without doubt - and the massive reduction in services from other government run healthcare systems in order to meet this new price tag and hide the fact that this thing will suck up a couple of trillion or more dollars. And considering how well the CBO has predicted the cost of these boondoggles, and how much more they have cost - Social Security was supposed to cost $9 billion at its peak and we all know that it costs tens of times more just as an example - this plan is likely to costs us a couple of tens of trillions. That is, unless government starts putting more than those senior citizens through death panels. Maybe people will also get their healthcare denied based on ideology. Not a far stretch considering how criminal activity is simply ignored by both the AG and the MSM when democrats and their allies do it. Even more fun is the fact that we will begin paying for this mess next year, but see nothing of the sort in healthcare services or policy until 2016 at the earliest. At the risk of getting Ed Kline’s panties in a bunch, let me again say this collectivist shit is nothing but a recipe for disaster.
Posted by AlexinCT on 10/29/09 at 04:26 PM in Health Care Left Wing Idiocy The Press Machine • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Back a while I pointed out how job creation by the
A simple “WTF?” isn’t enough. If we have less than 25K jobs, and I bet that number drops even lower, created so far, that means that less than 600K jobs total will be created by the allocated $339 billion, pushing the “per job” cost close to $650K! This is not just ridiculous, it is criminal.
In the mean time the number of jobs lost is fast approaching 5 million, and the real unemployment number – the people out of work and collecting unemployment, working part time, or simply abandoning any effort to work – is over 16%. Of course the solution by the collectivists was not to make changes to spur economic growth of any kind and create jobs, but to choose the path that makes the most people dependant on them and their largesse at the expense of the tax payer. A move touted with much fanfare and beating of drums, but which has come to a grinding halt because the republicans want real relief – the tax reduction kind – which is anathema to collectivists and their power grab agenda.
In the mean time, the MSM is reporting economic growth. Let’s wait for the revised numbers. They have always swung back the other way and been anything but good. Still hasn’t stopped these propagandists from trying though. What a difference the letter behind the occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. makes, huh? More cowbell!
Update: Looks like the blame game and the fantasies are being exposed. Let’s face it: the collectivists flushed down close to a trillion dollars ($1.25 trillion when all is said and done and we supposedly pay it all off) in a scam that simply served to funnel said cash into the pockets of operatives, lobbyists, agents, and donors, with the intent of having them load up the campaign coffers of democrats for the 2010 election, and we the tax payers are off much worse for it. And they now say the cure is for them to flush down a ton more, take over 1/5th of the economy, take away even more money from the productive, and to literally give government power over all aspects of our lives. I bet that we would have had a better economic result if the democrats had just followed the stupid Bush model of mailing checks for a few hundred dollars to all citizens - including the ones that paid no taxes - instead of this. Never thought I would argue these refunds or stimulus checks were a good thing. Well, in this case I guess they are still not a good thing. In fact, they are still a stupid idea. Just not as stupid as the
Posted by AlexinCT on 10/29/09 at 07:50 AM in Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
The Domino Theory
Just in case you were wondering, Honduras did the right thing:
Ortega has apparently learned his lesson from the “disastrous” open elections that swept the Sandys from power in 1990. He is borrowing a page from Chavez and Mahmoud, having kept the 2008 municipal voting totals secret and blocking local and international observers. There is very little doubt that the 2008 election was rife with fraud and little doubt that next election will be too.
Honduras, having watched this go on in two neighboring countries, decided not to fuck around. The minute Zelaya started going the Chavez route, they headed him off at the pass. And our government’s legal entities have concluded that they acting well within their constitutional authority (although the later crackdown on dissent was wrong). So whose side are we going to take again?
Update: The Democrats now want the Library of Congress to withdraw its report that concluded the Honduran Congress acted within its power. What is it with these people? They can’t tolerate any dissent.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 10/29/09 at 07:38 AM in Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
How To Run An Economy
Two disturbing reports about the Bush-Obama handling of the financial crisis. First, you remember AIG?
They estimate this cost us about $13 billion, depending on how low AIG could have negotiated their contracts. Yes, that’s Goldman Sachs, whose former chairman was on the NY Fed board and whose previous chairman and CEO was Bush’s treasury secretary at the time.
Then there’s this:
This is the problem with a political economy. This is the problem with bailouts. Suddenly, the rule of law and any economic sense are out the window. Instead of debts being wound down through the law and negotiation, they are unravelled through political battles and influence. In this case, powerful banks and auto unions were enriched at the expense of pension funds and the taxpayer.
This isn’t a Republic or Democrat issue; it’s an American one. Both our political parties have participated in this orgy; both have been happy to pillage the powerless in favor the powerful. The issue crosses such ideological lines that I’m even going to agree with Arianna Hufington:
Speak it, sister. Whatever one may think of capitalism, this isn’t it.
Update: Speaking of economic interference, Johnathan Macey has a must-read about what happened the last time Congress decided to limit executive pay.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 10/28/09 at 10:54 PM in Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Well blow me down!
It looks like the collectivist robber barons are about to again learn about the law of unintended consequences. New York state is one of those “fleece the rich” North Eastern blue states with punitive “progressive” taxation that does not apply to a few lucky people like Charles Rangel, and this is what it has resulted in:
think the collectivists running that freak show will figure out their policies drove away the productive or will they decide that the answer to their decreasing revenue problem is to fleece the productive even harder? I am voting for the later. And it doesn’t stop there. Here is the bad news:
Who would have thunk it? When you fleece the productive to buy votes from the unproductive, your productive people will bail and more of those non-productive people will move in to suck at the government’s teat. I see a pattern here. Even the USSR which had a prison state and didn’t allow the people to leave could not make this crap work. The Chinese are playing a shell game and for now things are going the way of the communists running that state as well. But sooner than later they too will realize the model they have is unsustainable when people want freedom. Especially with the US going more collectivist than they are and depriving them of a market to dump their stuff. Anyway, there was good news for New Yorkers:
I wonder how many of those 126K that left were millionaires fleeing that new millionaire tax. I bet that hurts even if there are a few dozen of them.
Posted by AlexinCT on 10/28/09 at 02:42 PM in Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
The Public Option Reloaded
Sullivan today, on the “public option” re-appearing in an “opt-out” form:
Almost every single word that sentence is dripping in bullshit.
First, the public option will not save money. Not without either rationing or forcing providers to participate at low reimbursement rates. The latter would constitute an indirect subsidy worth hundreds of billions of dollars. As Samuelson, in a must-read article says:
As I have pointed out, Medicare’s supposedly low overhead is based on borrowing infrastructure from other agencies and—most notably—running their insurance plan so badly that it is a cesspool where corrupt agents can become millionaires and honest docs are hurting. The public option is likely to be worse than this. We’ve seen a preview of it in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—the “public option” mortgage companies that were at the heart of the housing crisis, had to be bailed out to the tune of hundreds of billions and dollars and, unlike the TARP companies, are being allowed to pay out huge bonuses to their execs. That latter point is something to bear in mind. Once Fannie Med is created, it will, like the mortgage companies, produce a raft of highly-paid government-controlled jobs for political cronies.
Second—is the public option popular? If that’s so, why are the Democrats desperately trying to rename the public option to something less politically lethal? Even if it is popular, that doesn’t mean anything. If I argued that gay marriage bans should be passed because they’re popular, I doubt that Sullivan would agree.
Finally, there’s the claim that this is “squaring the circle” politically. Translation: if Republicans hate the public option, then red states can choose to opt of the system; therefore there should be no objection.
But that is a massive misrepresentation. Red states will have the option not to get the insurance. But they will not have the option to evade the cost shifting the plan is likely to create. They will not have the option to avoid the direct and indirect subsidies that Fannie Med is almost certain to require. They will not have the option to stick with insurance companies that are bankrupted or interstate companies that dump their private insurance or terrible business practices that become the industry standard (as has happened with Medicare). The “opt out”, such as it is, is the opportunity to get out of the benefits of the public option will still bearing the costs. That’s like a store offering to let you “opt out” of having to take home their merchandise while they continue to run up your credit card.
I guess I’m just not “anyone with a brain”. But I’m not alone in my brainlessness. Apart from Samuelson, there’s Roger Pilon, Michael Cannon, Megan McArdle, Greg Mankiw and Peter Suderman and Ronald Bailey. Even Tuesday Morning Quarterback is in on the action, arguing that our first step should be to replace comprehensive healthcare with major medical.
So other than being completely wrong about everything, it’s another great post from Sullivan.
Now, Let Me Be Clear, Watch This Drive
This made me laugh:
Bush’s golf outings never bothered me and Obama’s don’t either. But it is amusing to hear the thunderous silence from those who howled every time W picked up a 5-iron.
Monday, October 26, 2009
The Democrats are budgeting and—surprise!—they are spending enough to make Republicans look responsible. Almost.
Remember those deficit projections Obama was making? Those were based on the idea that spending would remain tied to the rate of inflation—and that the “stimulus” would be allowed to expire. But we’re now seeing that not only is the stimulus going to stay with us forever (as I and every other conservative/libertarian pundit said at the time) we’re going to get an endless series of stimuli that will boost spending and boost spending and boost spending until ... well, it’s not really clear what until. Until the Chinese stop loaning us money, I guess.
Update: Oddly enough, Congress has found one budget item they’re not sure about—defense.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 10/26/09 at 07:35 AM in Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Expose the cockroaches.
Despite the democrat controlled congress’ best efforts to hide the massive corruption and their role in the financial crisis we are currently seeing dragged out because of the collectivist policies intended to expand their power & government instead of fixing anything, some of their craven acts of corruption can not be wished away. This story is of particular importance and concern to me because one of the key players is none other than one of my state’s senators, Chris Dodd, a man that has never met a corrupt scheme or tax he didn’t like, and which is front and center in many of the current congress’ schemes to defraud the tax paying American people. Because they care about the people, of course. The democrat controlled congress, which constantly used their propaganda arm - the MSM - to tell us all about the “culture of corruption” on the other side, while not just ignoring real corruption amongst their own, but actively covering for it, without shame or remorse, seems to have lost a fight:
Even more important is the fact that these crooks are front & center in the blame game, and are demanding the right to “fix” the problem they blame everyone but themselves for.
Let me say it again: even more important, it is critical for the American people to see that these scams could not have been run without the help of the politicians, whom often were the movers & shakers that pushed for the system that ended up imploding on us. Especially since these politicians are now pointing fingers elsewhere and demanding to be allowed to write even more law around these problems while ignoring the fundamental underlying problem caused by their ideological economic policies that fly in the face of reality.
Posted by AlexinCT on 10/26/09 at 06:37 AM in Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics The Press Machine • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
As The New York Times Turns
Jeez, I leave the country for a couple of weeks and things go crazy. Not one but two pro-Obama publications are—gasp!—criticizing him for embracing Bush policy. The latter is the “legitimate” New York Times (as opposed to the illegitimate Fox News), usually a reliable source for using xeroxed Democratic press releases as news articles or editorials:
They detail several troubling actions by Obama—most notably the continuing threats against the UK for making the Binyam Mohamed documents public. These documents detail the extreme torture—way beyond waterboarding—that Mohamed endured in Pakistan, Morocco and a CIA black site. It has also claimed that any lawsuits over Bush-era policies can simply be dismissed by invoking national security concerns.
I’m going to do something rare—agree with the NYT. While Obama has made some notable changes in torture policy and surveillance, he has mostly given a new veneer to the old policies. I doubt this is based on principle. In the short history of this Administration, we’ve seen that political concerns trump everything. The Obama Administration does not want to hand the GOP ammunition to claim they are “weak” in the WOT.
The problem with that is that they are going to get accused of weakness anyway. Just last weak, Dick Cheney accused them of “dithering” on Afghanistan for pursuing the exact same policy Bush had. This was a laughable accusation from an Administration that insisted everything was wonderful in Iraq until they lost the 2006 election.
In general, you can’t dictate policy by the fear that the opposing party will impugn you because they are going to impugn you anyway. That’s the nature of politics. The parallel I would make is to when the GOP tried to outspend and out-socialized the Democrats. No matter how much they spent, they were still accused of “gutting” important social programs and starving grandma to death. So what was the point of compromising their principles?
As I said last week—what are the Democrats planning to do with their power? It seems like they’re mostly going to sit around and whine about Fox News. I suppose that’s an improvement on their usual policies. But there are some things that actually do need changing. And the Bush tendency toward secrecy, executive privilege and blanket security claims is one of them.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 10/26/09 at 06:07 AM in War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Who's Logged In
Total Members: 27587
Links and Info
The ACLU and Terry Jones
Most recent entries
This page has been viewed 42341570 times