SearchSearch using pMachine
The price of anything is the amount of life you exchange for it - Henry David Thoreau
Friday, March 25, 2011
Baldur Has Spoken
Here’s a question for the floor: should Iceland bail out British and Dutch governments?
There are many issues wrapped around this. The UK invoked anti-terrorism laws to seize some bank assets, which created a bad political climate. There are also currency issues, since Iceland is not on the Euro.
If I were Icelandic, I would probably vote “no”. It seems to me—and I know our UK readers will probably disagree with me—that the governments of the UK and Netherlands made the key decision in bailing out their citizens and now are bullying Iceland into covering for their mistake. I have no problem with going after Landsbanki. But why should the citizens of Iceland be forced to cough up for this? It’s not like they collected the big returns in the first place.
(There is a threat from Moody’s that they will downgrade Icelandic bonds if the referendum fails. This threat—blackmail really—would be next to meaningless in a rational world. Moody’s spent the last decade giving AAA ratings to mortgage-backed securities that turned out to be big piles of shit. Their chief economist—Mark Zandi—is a loon who thinks all government spending pays for itself five times over and predicted that we’d hit the bottom of the real estate market four years ago (note: the real estate market is still plunging; new home stars reached a three-decade low last month). Investors would be stupid to pay attention to Moody’s attempt to blackmail Iceland. Hell, if I had money, I’d buy Icelandic bonds just to give the finger to Moody’s. A no on the referendum affects Iceland’s ability to pay off private debts, not public ones.)
I can see the counter-argument. Iceland’s economy boomed on the back of banking bullshit and a lot of people lost their shirts in banks that Iceland was supposed to be regulating. I’ve tried to figure out what aide has been given to Iceland but the crossing of banking, government, EU, IMF and other things has singed my circuits a bit. They have gotten a reasonable deal on terms and interest on the repayments—but that sort of hinges on thinking the repayments are justified.
I’m sure there are other aspects that our European friends would be happy to enlighten me about. I’m happy to hear that I’m wrong on this. But my gut reaction would be to oppose it.
Wednesday, December 01, 2010
Vote “No” on Obama’s START treaty.
Congress is currently looking at the START treaty the dreamy eyed Obama team has been pushing for. I have repeatedly pointed out how bad of an agreement this is for the US, specifically because and in typical pre-Cold war fashion, we have the same kind of peacenik morons giving away our critical missile defense capability, by drastically limiting our options. I am not alone on this issue. Considering how adamant State and Obama were that this was not the case, this revelation, which came out as part of the Wikileaks shenanigans of Assange, sure points to the fact that everyone else is worried that the US will get substantive missile defense capabilities.
The Russians sure seem to think so, or they wouldn’t have been so adamant about limiting our capabilities. This Administration is also pulling a Bill Clinton “What’s the meaning of ‘is’” defense to claim the treaty doesn’t obligate the US to give up missile defense, when it clearly does. Then you have Harry Reid pulling a Pelosi on Healthcare Reform, a.k.a government takeover of healthcare, and telling us that they should ratify the treaty so we can find out what’s in it. Way to go morons!
Kill this thing and negotiate, in earnest, so we do not have to give up our defensive capabilities. With North Korea on the verge of giving new meaning to “Coo-Coo for Coco Puffs” and Iran already showing us they will either use the leverage of owning a nuke to destabilize the area or actually just use it to do so, I think we might really want to push that whole missile defense thing to be non-negotiable. I am sure our NATO allies will agree now that we find out Iran has obtained missiles from China that can easily hit Europe, and can carry nukes. I can even go for the idea of sharing the shield with the Russians, since Moscow would also end up being vulnerable, although I bristle at sharing the technology. The Russians have a bigger problem with the Chinese stealing their military tech and copying it than we do.
Posted by AlexinCT on 12/01/10 at 12:32 PM in Deep Thoughts Europe and the UK Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Friday, September 24, 2010
Update on the UK Coalition
Who would have thought that a Tory-Lib Dem coalition would produce this:
Under the Labour Party, the number of quasi-non-governmental organizations soared to over a thousand, with over 100,000 employees and 65 billion pounds of expense. The coalition has already dumped 80 of them. If they go all the way, that means 40% of these bodies would be abolished within the first year or so of the Coalition. And almost all of them will claim that they serve some legitimate purpose and help the greater British public. None of them will admit to being useless or redundant.
This is what budget cuts look like, my friends. Get familiar with it. One day, it will have to come here. The question is whether it will be before or after we drive into a fiscal brick wall.
While I am not happy with the UK government’s plan to have paychecks funneled through government for taxation (see Alex’s earlier post), I am really liking the coalition in the UK in most other respects. National ID cards are being dumped, the surveillance state is being rolled back, civil liberties are on the mend and the government is serious about cutting spending (although rumors that they plan to gut science budgets are bit alarming). The GOP isn’t where the Tories are, yet. But there’s hope.
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Europe Leads the Way
It’s a sad day when the European Socialist States (TM) are exercising more fiscal responsibility than we are:
This will prove an interest test of Keynesian theories. According to every screeching Leftist on the pages of the New York Times, this should plunge Europe into a depression while America soars to new heights on the wings of the Stimulus. Of course, it’s not like the Keynesians ever let reality constrain their imaginations anyway.
Still, we’re in the sad position now of having a President who isn’t as free-spending as Europe.
Monday, May 24, 2010
The economy, government spending, and healthcare..
I have been busier than a one legged man at an ass-kicking contest the last month or so, and have not posed much, but today I have finally gotten some slow time and decided it was time to get back at it. And I think the appropriate place to start is with the current economic crisis gripping the world, and closer at home, this whole government healthcare takeover thingy, better know as Obamacare. Since everyone but the usual bureaucrats seem to understand the budgetary problems facing the great Western socialist paradises on the verge of economic collapse are caused because the parasites “working” in government have had a great run for the last few decades buying themselves both power and bennies with other people’s money, and are discussing the fact that we can’t keep spending at the rate we are, it should be obvious that this massive government expansion would remain unpopular and continue to get more unpopular as people realize the economic impacts associated with it. In fact, the numbers for those of us wanting it repealed, have climbed to 63%, and they are just going to keep going up as even the CBO now has to admit. I am sure the democrats are quite surprised that it now looks like Obamacare will not save us anything but actually cost more. And that is with a shameful slight of hand/scam used by those promoting this most massive government expansion since the first day of the Roosevelt socialist takeover, that allows the government to collect taxes for 10 years, but then only offer services for the last 5 or 6 years in a 10 year cycle. As I have pointed out repeatedly, it should be blatantly obvious that there is no arguing that even if the program doesn’t end up as I suspect it will deep in the red in the first decade, come the next 10 year cycle, the program is going to be short a trillion or more from the start.
The left made a successful run at power starting back in 2008 by pointing out the lack of fiscal discipline by the demcorats. Of course, many forget that despite the president’s best efforts spending is done by Congress, and that Bush’s worst years are those after the demcorats took over in 2006. The left of course blamed Bush’s “warmongering” for the out of control spending despite the obvious fact that this stuff was peanuts compared to the massive, bloated, and ever expanding social spending. Many like me laughed hard at the demcorats pretending to be fiscal hawks, and warned others that they were being lied to. Now but 18 months after they sweeped, we have tacked on, in a single year no less, more than all the Bush years combined. And we are going to tack on oodles more, even if we discount the disastrous Obamacare government takeover of the healthcare monies and decision making process (because that is really what this was about) masquerading as healthcare reform, because that’s what these people are about. Call me cruel or insensitive to my fellow man, but I still remain unable to quantify any benefits for society as a whole from all this social spending, and see it doing far more damage than good, but that’s neither here nor there. When we have created a whole new ever expanding class of serfs dependant on government for their daily subsistence – people that have trade freedoms in return for minimal security, and have as a result neither – that are akin to slaves, lacking in any desire to contribute to the advancement of mankind, other than by the means, I see very little good coming from all this spending. At least the money spent on the military provides decent and good jobs for hardworking taxpayers. Hey, maybe I am just biased that way…
The fact is that this collectivist stuff, past anything other than a family unit, is unsustainable. No, that’s not just my opinion, as the facts clearly prove. The people that see government and this socialist stuff as the answer to everything are trying to reverse course with actions like this one, or this one, all the while maligning and blaming the only system that has actually created new wealth and helped improve our standard of living on this planet, while the collectivists remain good, and that is me being generous because they even suck at that, at wealth redistribution and destruction schemes. The stuff that has gotten us where we are now (no, it was not Bush), and the people that know, are predicting even more bad times.
I often wonder why so many still do not realize or see how Obamacare is going to serve only to speed up our demise. And it isn’t even as if we are actually going to get something good from it. Oh, sure the usual morons have argued about the evils of private insurance and how this government takeover addresses that, but anyone making that argument is an absolute moron. If anything, you will see the very things that so concerned and angered them when done by private insurance companies, happen with more frequency now that a broke government looking to drag out the circling process that is taking us all down the drain as long as possible, will be in charge. You think those evil insurance people were bad? Wait until you have to deal with a spiteful and petty government employee that gets off on the power that their ability to make your life miserable by denying you services, gives them. At least when the insurance companies did it you were under the illusion that you could seek redress from government. Who will you turn to when it is government that is putting the screws to you? Other government employees? Yeah, good luck with that. Don’t worry though. At the rate we are going we might just implode and all end up without healthcare or anything else for that matter, returning to a 19th century standard of living. But in the eyes of these collectivist that would be a good thing – social justice has been served since we are all equally miserable – considering that the only evil they see is that life doesn’t guarantee equality of outcome.
UPDATE: Arthur C. Brooks has this absolutely awesome piece titled “America’s new culture war: Free enterprise vs. government control” over on the WaPO opinion pages. A must read to understand what is currently going on.Close this post...
Posted by AlexinCT on 05/24/10 at 08:37 AM in Deep Thoughts Elections Europe and the UK Health Care Left Wing Idiocy Polls and Surveys War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Change the Brits Can Believe In
As you may know, Britain is currently under an unlikely coalition of Tories and Liberal Democrats. I have been cautiously optimistic about this unusual alliance. I think the combination could produce some good things for Britain.
Looks like I was right:
That’s six billion right away. The real test will come when the Brits have to cut government employees and social services. But, in a week, they’ve already cut six billion more than Obama has in a year and a half.
There’s more. Nick Clegg, now deputy PM, and with the backing of the Tories, has stated they will start ripping down some of the surveillance state in Britain, investigate allegations of torture, put in place a massive electoral overhaul and roll back the excesses of the criminal justice system. Read this:
This is inspiring stuff, guys. It’s not just words; it’s their official platform.
Now this is still a British government, so there are no plans to dismantle the NHS or anything. But it looks like the UK is about to take a huge step in the right direction. And this is, in no small part, because they had to form a coalition of two parties. This allow real ideas to move forward, while giving both parties political cover. It makes you wonder what might happen if the Libertarians ever got their heads out of their asses and became a viable third party.
In the meantime, our Candidate of Change is comfortable with the War on Drugs, sees no need to reform the criminal justice system, is arguing in court that he can disappear people in Bagram and had a fit because the Supreme Court lifted restriction on corporate speech. In short, as Radley Balko noted, Obama is keeping every promise he made when it comes to taking away our freedom. He is keeping none of the ones that involve giving it back.
Look at the Cameron-Clegg partnership. Look at Obama. Who is the force for real change?
Friday, May 07, 2010
It looks like the election in Britain, while giving a clear plurality to the Tories, is not going to give them the majority they need to take control of parliament.
I haven’t commented on the UK election but I’ve been following it closely. My sympathies, naturally, are with the Tories and I’m glad to see Labour get their asses handed to them. What has struck me, even today, is how arrogant Gordon Brown is. Even after getting hammered last night, he’s babbling about forming a coalition with the LIb Dems to maintain his spectacularly incompetent rule. That’s his privilege as sitting PM but I’m hoping the Liberal Democrats are not quite that stupid.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 05/07/10 at 06:27 AM in Elections Election 2010 Europe and the UK • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Thursday, May 06, 2010
The Perfect Storm
I don’t think I’ve ever done a “If Bush Was President When This Happened” post, but this is one of those rare times when a confluence of events occur which compels such an observation.
Within the span of two weeks, we’ve had:
an environmental catastrophe on the Gulf Coast;
protests for civil liberties combined with ethnic tribalism in response to Arizona’s new illegal immigration law, in conjunction with a proposal for a national biometric ID card;
massive flooding in Tennessee that’s left at least 29 people dead;
a car-bombing attempt in Times Square that only failed because the terrorist was too incompetent to wire the explosives correctly;
a potential global financial meltdown in the making;
the stock market boomerang 600 points and back in the span of 30 minutes;
and the death of a bill to audit the Fed in the Senate.
Now just imagine that Bush was President if these things happened all at once. I think it’s beyond dispute that Kos, Matthew Yglesias, John Cole, Paul Krugman, and every other leftist hack would be calling for impeachment, investigations, and frog-marches of everyone and anyone connected with the administration if all these things happened at once (and Republican shills would be finding endless excuses for all these things, too). The media would be wall-to-wall with stories asking “why doesn’t the President DO SOMETHING about this?”
Does anyone honestly believe that if Obama was a Republican, he wouldn’t be getting hammered about all this, even in the situations that are largely beyond his control? For god’s sake, the US just participated in the bailout of Greece through its 17% stake in the IMF--what would Senator Obama have said in a situation where the American taxpayer became partially responsible for bailing out foreign banks?
Yes, that last question is rhetorical.
There’s little point in having a federal government structure in place that isn’t safeguarding the interests of its citizens or taking responsibilty for the powers granted it by the Constitution. Obama said during his inauguration speech that government needs to work better for its people, but he’s shown during his time in office that he is largely incapable of showing the kind of leadership people expect when the shit hits the fan.
The truly pathetic aspect of all this? The Stupid Party doesn’t really have anyone that could do appreciably better. This is the end game that the offal of the post-WW2 generations has produced for us.
Posted by on 05/06/10 at 07:38 PM in Decline of Western Civilization Europe and the UK Politics The Press Machine • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Greece On the Brink
Greece seems to determined to bite the hand that is feeding them. The rest of the EU is tightening their belts to try to keep Greece from completely collapsing under their debt. The condition on this bailout is that they have to, you know, get their fucking house in order. The results has been an explosion of protests and violence that have now left three dead on the eve of the austerity vote. More protests are planned for today.
I have no idea of the macroeconomic implications. But if I were a resident of Germany of France, I’d be very tempted to just cut Greece lose. Let them spiral down into debt and inflation if that’s what they want. It’s quite clear that decades of generous government benefits have spoiled her people rotten and given them the illusion that money grows on trees. If this austerity package is rejected, then let them eat baklava.
Update: Michael Moynihan draws the obvious comparison. Violent and deadly protests in Greece are regarded as more legitimate than peaceful protests here. Moynihan clearly does not understand the morality in play. Anything is acceptable when you’re protesting in favor of more government; nothing is acceptable when you’re protesting against it.
Update: Read this article about just how bad things are. Hairdressers in Greece can retire at 50. Because their job is “hazardous”. Also check out the infographic on the left. See how many countries have obligations that are anywhere from 3 to 15 times their GDP.
There’s a generational war coming. And I feel like the Baby Boomers are going to screw us all. Again.
Friday, April 23, 2010
The Right To The Beach
On the same week when one of their most overspent countries is teetering on the brink of complete fiscal collapse owing to over-generous government employee benefits, the EU is closing in on securing humanity’s newest “right”.
The man literally claims that tourism is a right. But let’s not give him too much credit by assuming he’s an idiotic idealist. Tajani is a product of one of the most comically corrupt governments in the Western world—that of Silvio Berlusconi. This declaration is mostly an excuse for governments to subsidize the tourists industry. Getting people on their vacations is a side effect of that funneling of taxpayer cash.
I think the EU should solve both their problems at once. Send all the young people and pensioners to Greece so that they can tour and simultaneously see the massive economic collapse that awaits all social welfare states.
Friday, March 26, 2010
All The Sex That’s Fit To Silence
Don’t know if you caught the latest update on Loud British Sex Woman:
I would suggest reading the article but it has a picture of Noisy Sex Woman and ... well, you don’t want to think about that. But, according to her, they moved the bed downstairs, had sex for ten minutes and the neighbors called the cops. They used to have sex for two hours a day.
A few random thoughts:
1) Maybe I’m reaching here, but it sounds like the neighbors had their ears pressed to the wall, waiting to here these people go at it. The occasional ten minutes of sex, even noisy sex, doesn’t sound too bad to me. When I lived in apartments, I had neighbors I would gladly trade in for that.
2) Maybe I’m stereotyping. Or just jealous. But if these people were having two hour sex marathons every day, I’m guessing they were not the most employed people in the world. So we’re seeing both sides of the Nanny State at work here.
3) I have a solution to this problem: move these people to America. Here they will get all the free healthcare and subsidized housing the want, but with none of encroachment of judges. The worst that will happen is the occasional YouTube upload.
In fact, that should be our motto to encourage immigration: America. All of the welfare. None of the Asbos.
Update: In other British Sex News, an airport worker is in trouble for using one of the new scanning machines to take a gander at his busty co-worker’s assets. The abuse of these machines is something that I’m sure no one could have foreseen, of course.
Thursday, March 04, 2010
Beware Gifts Bearing Greeks, Part II
With a caveat that the sequel is rarely as good as the original....
I wanted to follow up on Hal’s post from a couple of days ago on the financial turmoil that’s been going on in Greece. This has been an object of somewhat obsessive attention over at Zerohedge the past few weeks, and the focus has largely been on the similarities between this and what happened when TARP was being debated. While I can certainly see this as applied to a continental rather than national scale, I think the implications here are far greater.
In my opinion, what is going on in Greece marks it as a bellwether on the survivability of the EU in the short-term, and the welfare state in the long-term. The EU has two choices--1) come up with some sort of bailout plan for a member nation who, economically speaking, is something of a red-headed stepchild due to its lack of economic diversity (most jobs in Greece are in government or tourism); or 2) tell them “Sorry, we can’t throw good money after bad,” and Greece ends up leaving the EU to go back to a vastly devalued Drachma.
If the EU picks the first option, it’s going to open the floodgates. Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Ireland are all in way over their heads in government debt, with France, the UK, and Germany not too far behind. It will be impossible for the more stable members of the EU to justify denying bailouts to the the other PIIGS, when they spent all this time agonizing over how to fix the problem and came up with a bailout as the way to fix things. The “austerity measures” put in by Greece are a joke, because it doesn’t change the fundamental culture of entitlement that’s infected the populace, so they’ll likely end up having to come back to the trough again in a year or so begging for more.
If the second option is chosen, what motivation would Greece or the other PIIGS have to stay in the EU? The whole idea behind the EU was to create an economic superpower that could compete with the US and Russia for global trade. If the EU won’t prop up a member of its own economic alliance, why should Italy or Spain or Portugal bother staying in? Better to just cut loose and try to figure things out on their own without subjecting the country’s citizens to endless agonizing uncertainty on the economic direction of the nation.
Either way, count on what happens with Greece to eventually filter over to the United States at some point. As Hal pointed out, Greece’s welfare state, like most European nations, is quite robust and the populace has come to depend on entitlement programs--specifically, the national pension system--as their means of survival. In the same way, Social Security, Medicare, and pension systems here in the US are seen as necessary by most Americans--an entitlement that comes with putting money into a system and expecting financial compensation at a later date. The problem is that these programs have finally reached the breaking point of sustainability.
I’m sorry, but there is no way that all the government entitlements, including pensions, that Americans have come to take for granted can be sustained over the long run with such a bleak financial picture. Coupled with the fact that the federal government’s debt ceiling is 100% of GDP (and even more than that when the toxic crap on Fannie and Freddie’s ledgers that Obama is keeping off the books is factored in), and you have a recipe for some serious pain. It won’t even matter how much taxes are raised; the US is staring in the face of debt that it cannot possibly meet, short of a global collapse that leaves it as the only major resource provider for the rest of the world.
One thing people have to understand is that the origin of the welfare state was not rooted in any sort of magnanimous national philosophy that all citizens should look out for one another through the machinations of the state. It was rooted in the need by Bismarck to keep the socialists from baying about Prussia’s military adventures; welfare always has been about the cultural elites maintaining their place of superiority in society by giving the plebians just enough to survive so they don’t try to remove the elites from power. It was never been about creating equality or a sustainable economic system--the very fact that the welfare state has relied on exponential growth in population and inflation over the last 140 years or so to maintain itself renders the notion of its inherent sustainability a joke, along with the complete failure of the War on Poverty.
The biggest crime being committed by our so-called leaders, and our citizens, rests on the fact that rather than accept responsibility for what needs to be done to fix the problem--that is, clear out the debt by all means necessary--most Americans have resorted the coward’s measure of hoping someone figures out a way to cook the books, so that “extend and pretend” remains the nation’s economic policy until they are safely in their graves.Close this post...
Posted by on 03/04/10 at 05:42 PM in Decline of Western Civilization Europe and the UK Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Friday, February 26, 2010
Things to ponder about our impending government healthcare takeover
I did not watch that 7+ hour freakshow that the democrats were hoping to use as a vehicle to paint the republicans as evil “no sayers” with no ideas or plans on healthcare with the help of the usual suspects in their controlled MSM – while anyone that had the ability to navigate a web browser and Google could see these donkeys were full of it – and I am glad I didn’t waste my time. The democrats pretended to care and to want bipartisanship, only they meant by bipartisanship that the republicans should do what they wanted and be happy about it. The leftist twits are now threatening reconciliation – a process that has never been used in the way they intend to abuse it, but we are talking about the party of the end justifies the means after all here – despite the public objection to this debacle. It is now or never and all or nothing with these fools. And they are continuing to pretend that they are doing it to help the country and the people economically, while also providing care to all those poor people that can’t afford it. How noble, but al bullshit. The end game still is to have government literally take over and control 1/5th of our economy. Not to mention get the power over life and death decisions. Fun stuff, but I want to talk about the cost to us tax payers.
Here is a little tid-bit that the Obamacare healthcare takeover by big government plan that the democrats are still pushing on us, despite the obvious fact the thing is hated (they know what’s better for us rubes!), that we all should keep in mind every time these retards running the country right now tell us their plan will save us money in the long run: they are going to tax us for 10 years to provide us with 6 years of DMV style government controlled healthcare.
That’s right. They will start taxing us the moment the ink dries on that 2400 or 2600 page – depending if it is the Senate or House version of the government healthcare takeover bill – monstrosity, but we will not see a single benefit for 4 years. After that, they will tightly control what we can get and when too. To keep costs down, you know.
So I guess, as I was thinking this out, I was truck by the question “what happens after the next 10 years?”. Do they then stop providing 4 years of services at the end of the 10 years, while they continue to tax us, and then pick it back up and, offer services for the next 6 like they did in the first iteration? Rinse and repeat the same cycle going forward? Yeah, I know. I am just being a dick, but I am pointing out the obvious: only a moron believes that this plan will save the country any money, let alone break even, and only craven liars would say so. Considering how good these democrats are at the truth however, one can’t be surprised. And I will go on a limb and make the prediction that even after they have collected 4 years of taxes before they allow us to get a single benefit, it won’t take more than a year or 18 months for this thing to be in the red, and by the end of the next 6 years it will have cost us at least twice as much as the Obamanauts are now saying it will.
We all know that they will not stop providing services for 4 out of the 10 years they will tax us. So, in the end, this thing is going to force them to look for some more cost cutting measures. That’s when you get the long Canadian-style waiting periods, and the soon to come European-style age limits at which the doctors will simply tell you the cost vs. the return isn’t worth it, and that you the patient should go make sure you have your funeral plans put together. But that’s not going to be able to address the cost of “free healthcare”. So what we will get is more deficit spending and taxes levied on us all. And then maybe sooner than later, the same destiny as Greece is currently going through. Don’t worry. Once we become a two bit Marxist state, we can all be equally as miserable. That is, unless we are lucky enough to be one of the elite. Unfortunately too many morons think they are going to be part of that elite group, but as history has shown, these kind of elite like their groups small and tight. What’s even more saddening is the large group of losers that are content with crap simply because it means others can do no better either. That’s social justice in a nutshell for ya.Close this post...
Posted by AlexinCT on 02/26/10 at 09:10 AM in Decline of Western Civilization Elections Election 2010 Europe and the UK Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics The Press Machine • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Sunday, February 21, 2010
That’s an interesting new agle..
Ever getting more desperate to lay blame on everything but the failures of the collectivist ideology and the stupidity of those that actually think they can make the wealth redistribution scheme work, we now have Zapatero in Spain -another one of the collectivist hell-holes in Europe that after the Madrid bombing took a turn for the worst, abandoned the changes instituted by the previous administration to reverse the damage done by dumb collectivist economics, and destroyed its economy in the process - blaming, hold your horses cause this is a doozy, the Anglo-Saxon media?
Let me get this straight. The Spanish PM has sicked the Spanish intelligence service on the Anglo-Saxon media, in particular the financial media, for having the temerity to point out that the Spanish economy is a basket case due to the collectivist policies that simply are unsustainable? Where are the calls of fascism from the left on this? Cause you can’t get more fascist than concocting a phony conspiracy for the reason your economic practices fail and then using the power of the state to make it look like you actually have a case. I am sure the Spanish are now all feeling better that their PM has figured out who to go after while the unsustainable collectivist house of cards implodes around them. If you dig a little deeper though you find out what the problem really is.
We once talked about the domino effect when addressing the expansion of collectivism in the form of communism. The left hated that then, and has done its best to discredit the idea, or the danger posed by said communist expansion. The bad guy was always the west for fighting it. Communism was no threat at all! It is hilarious, at least to me, that we are now seeing a similar terminology applied to the collapse of another collectivist ideology that has crippled the western world. If man would but learn the lesson that stealing from those that produce to buy privilege and power through the redistribution of the ill gotten gains, all under the guise of helping the less well off, is a recipe for disaster, we would have a chance. Of course, with the left hell bent on doing the damage no matter the resistance, we might just be doomed no matter what. Maybe Obama can blame the economic implosion he is presiding over on Bush too....
Posted by AlexinCT on 02/21/10 at 09:22 AM in Decline of Western Civilization Europe and the UK Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics The Press Machine • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Greeks mad at Germans for not bailing them out..
I can’t believe the many levels of irony wrapped up in the Greek anger at the German refusal to bail the m out. Literally class warfare at its best! The poor Greek are now angry at the rich and well off Germans for not feeling obligated to save them from decades of their own mistakes, mismanagement, and misfortunes. And this is going on in collectivist Europe! Greece is broke, but because it is part of the EU, it can’t simply use the old standby of the pre EU days, and devalue its currency. So the other EU states demanded austerity measures. Germany’s leaders which just recently upped the retirement age from 65 to 67, in large part to address the unsustainable costs of the nanny state and the looming fiscal disaster, simply decided that handing the Greeks, whom can retire at 61 and were refusing to even go along and only promising (one that they would not keep I bet) to do something around 2015 by going to the hard age of 63, a wad of cash was not going to be well received by the German voters, and decided to put their foot down. And that pissed of the Greeks.
The Greeks feel that the greedy damned Germans don’t want to do their civic duty and pony up cash. Conversely the Germans are pissed that the lazy Greeks just want to make them pay for their sweet life. You have the Greeks – whom aren’t very well known for any kind of work ethic and love to party – angry at the Germans for not wanting to subsidize their ride. Where have we seen this before? I mean, is this hilarity or what? This kind of economic model was doomed from the start, but the evil ones are the ones that do not feel obligated to part with the fruits of their labor for whatever sad story the other side wants to use to keep the cushy life. If we were not heading the same way, this would be classic comedy. As for the future of the EU? My guess is the Euro goes bye-bye soonish. The Greeks are not interested in changing the way things are. The better off Euroepean countries are drawing the line because if they do this for Greece now they will have to do it for Portugal, Spain, Ireland, maybe Italy, and sooner than later Greece again. The end result is the same though: sooner than later the golden goose dies off, or cuts off the parasites feasting on it.
Posted by AlexinCT on 02/18/10 at 12:08 PM in Decline of Western Civilization Europe and the UK Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Who's Logged In
Total Members: 27587
Links and Info
The ACLU and Terry Jones
Most recent entries
This page has been viewed 43781228 times