SearchSearch using pMachine
Don't stay in bed, unless you can make money in bed. - George Burns
Saturday, April 02, 2011
Well, looks like that asshole in Florida got what he wanted:
This is not a protest gone wrong. The violence has been deliberately stirred by religious fanatics in the region. UN Insiders think this could spell the end for the international presence in Afghanistan. How this will affect US policy has yet to be determined. The media, to their credit, did not cover the burning, which happens a couple of weeks ago. They decided not give the attention whore what he craved.
It hardly needs to be said that I think both groups of fanatics deserve each other. Jones has the great fortune to live in a country that respects free speech and will ensure nothing bad happens to him. And a region that explodes in violence because of a book burning on the opposite side of the world was simply waiting for a reason. If hadn’t been the Quran burning, it would have been something else. But a lot of innocent people are going to get swept up in this.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 04/02/11 at 01:16 PM in The Religion of Peace™ • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Monday, March 28, 2011
Veena Malik Brings It
If you haven’t watched this, you really should.
It’s actress Veena Malik responding to accusations that her participation in India’s equivalent of “Big Brother” defames Pakistan. They put her into a Crossfire-style debate with a cleric and she lets him have it. As a reminder, these guys make death threats against people who defy them—especially women—and carry them out. And she had, indeed, been targeted by the Taliban.
Not a lot of people could stand up to these guys. This woman has bigger balls that some entire countries.
Update: Speaking of outspoken women, read more about the Libyan government’s ongoing efforts to get Eman al-Obeidy to shut up.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 03/28/11 at 06:59 PM in The Religion of Peace™ • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Saturday, March 19, 2011
And how those of us that pointed out that odds favored that whole affair ending up wrong were told it was about democracy? Well, how does this fit with that?
Forget the fact that I think ElBaradei is a douchbag of the first order. Or that I have a hearty laugh at the fact these idiots claim he is widely respected on the world stage - respect on the world stage usually equates with anti-US/anti-Israeli sentiments and much love for collectivist idiocy and totalitarian leftist governments which sooner or later end up screwing over their people – in order to elevate the man’s status. Pay attention to the fact that the Egyptian brotherhood has made it clear they want nothing to do with him or secularism.
You have to wonder what that reality is, huh?
Posted by AlexinCT on 03/19/11 at 01:14 PM in Religion and Sky Pixies The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
That’s the way to respond
Say what you want about Putin - I think the guy is a dangerous ex-KGB operative throwback of the “good ole days” of the USSR ,and a manipulative bastard - but he, sure as hell knows how to repsond to terrorist scum:
The people behind this attack only understand and respect violence. Put asside the fact that security at this airport was piss poor according to the Russian officials own statements, the fact remains that these radicals attack where they see weakness. At least it is kind of Kharmic justice that the Russians are reaping some of that Islamic radicalism they helped foment back in the days that the KGB decided to teach Arraft’s goons how to be master terrorists so they could screw with the West. Maybe it will even make them worry about their cozy relationship with not jobs like the ones that are running Iran right now and getting help from the Russians to build nukes. I am sure nobody in Russia is right now saying how great of an ooporunity this tragedy is for Putin & Medvedev to look presidential, though I suspect they will take advantage of it too.
Posted by AlexinCT on 01/25/11 at 08:16 AM in Deep Thoughts The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
The Ground Zero Plan, Part II
Greg Gutfield has an awesome idea for what to build across the street from the Park 51 project (aka the Ground Zero Mosque):
If he is serious, this would be great. It perfectly illustrates the line I see between “not offending anyone”, which carries zero water with me and “discriminating against someone”, which does. Would the Park51 people find the gay bar offensive? Probably. Too bad guys. Freedom cuts every way we can imagine.
The beauty of this is that the Park 51 developers can’t really oppose this (anymore than the could oppose a pork deli or a strip club). Once they open the door of “I am offended”, they’ll be the first ones to fall through it.
Posted by Hal_10000 on 08/10/10 at 05:12 PM in The Religion of Peace™ • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Now they are gonna get it!
Either Obama was handled by some right wing warmonger or he is showing more of the stupid that is rampant in the liberal ideological system when he said that al Qaeda was a racist organization.
I say brilliant! I sure as hell hope this was a plant by right wingers to finally get this government of fools, hell bent on making al Qaeda like us, pissed at these bastards. If you look at what Obama is saying it literally comes down to “hey, we finally see al Qaeda, and organization that has a long and distinguished homicide bomber and murder record, is bad because they are killing blacks!”, and it seems to be hitting one of the three pillars of liberal ideological black listing; racism, sexism, and homophobia.
Suddenly, because they are now going of West Africans, they are bad guys. Maybe now Eric Holder will have an interest in going after them? It’s Arabs on black violence, after all. Let’s forget the feeling you get reading Obama’s words that he is almost regretful that al Qaeda is targeting people he feels would be sympathetic to their cause for now, and focus on the fact that the WH suddenly has decided these guys are real bad. Maybe we can go after them for hate crimes now? Heck, Gitmo might suddenly become a good thing too. What’s next? Islamic radicalism might even make its way back into the lexicon? You have to forgive me for seeing a conspiracy here considering the revelations.
Let’s get the WH to see that al Qaeda is also virulently homophobic and sexist, and maybe we actually will get them to have the UN send them an angry letter…
Dirkka dirkka, Mohamed Jihad!
Posted by AlexinCT on 07/14/10 at 10:22 AM in Fun and Humor Left Wing Idiocy The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Wednesday, July 07, 2010
Bold admission that Iran going nuclear is bad..
Israel has had nuclear weapons now for a few decades, and short of the usual nutjob demanding the Jews be pushed into the sea and the land reclaimed, non of its Arab nations have ever felt the need to build nukes to protect themselves. As anyone that hasn’t been living under a rock knows, that sentiment has not been extended to Iran, a fellow traveler and the nation vying for the title of top Jew hater, which has nuclear ambitions. In fact, Iran’s Arab neighbors are all either contemplating nuclear programs of their own - something they never felt compelled to do to keep up with Israel, or flat out pointing out that only idiots think anything short of force will deter Iran at this point.
Emphasis mine on that last bit. See, the only people surprised by this are the morons that also still believe talk can make a difference. That the problem here isn’t that Iran is run by destructive madmen, but that we (meaning that aggressive America of the Bush age) are the evil ones. This Ambassador has basically admitted that at least his country, the UAE, knows that nothing short of force will deter Iran at this point, and that Iran’s terror supporting/enabling leadership is pursuing these weapons so it can use the shield it will provide them, to escalate that support. And he has done it in public. He knows Iran will cause mayhem in this region if they go nuclear. Don’t take my word for this:
Exactly! Why does Iran need nukes if it has gotten away with this stuff already? The only thing that makes any kind of sense is that Iran plans to escalate, not reduce its efforts and the problems that its proxies are causing, and it thinks that nuclear umbrella will protect it from what happened to Saddam in Iraq or the Taliban in Afghanistan when they pushed us too hard. Does anyone doubt we would have handled these situations differently if we had to deal with a nuclear armed enemy? Thank Israel that Saddam didn’t have nukes. We might be thanking them too for Iran not having them sooner than later.
Of course, I am sure the usual leftards will now chime in that a nuclear enemy might have prevented Bush’s cowboy adventurism, and thus justify why we should let Iran go nuclear, but before you actually think these morons have a valid point, consider the following statement by the UAE ambassador:
Anyone thinking that this will result in more stability or lead to a better world is not just a moron, they are delusional. As I have often said, at a minimum you will get this:
Your average ignorant moron would argue that there is nothing wrong with these countries going nuclear too, I am sure. After all, Pakistan and India did it. And we are even living with the Norks being a nuclear nation. Let me point out what this ambassador had to say about that…
I think the US would not be able to live with it either, but then again, the people that think this way are also the ones that believed the USSR should have been the one to win the Cold War, America isn’t fit to be the world’s leader because it is the root of all evil, China would do a better job than the US if it was top dog, and that they are able to use talk to keep a nuclear armed Iran in line. No matter how this plays out, it is going to be ugly. The thing is, as this ambassador has pointed out, that a nuclear armed Iran will be much more costly than whatever crap we get if we prevent it by force.Close this post...
Posted by AlexinCT on 07/07/10 at 07:23 AM in Deep Thoughts Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics The Press Machine The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Monday, June 14, 2010
Think about this…
You know we in the West have horribly botched up dealing with the Iranian leadership’s nuclear ambitions when the Saudis are siding with Israel against Iran. True, Arabs in general have feared Iran, and with good reason, and they aught to fear a nuclear armed Iran run by these maniacs even more. They know that the Obama and UN sanctions against Iran will accomplish nothing. Just like all the other wasted talk over the last 8 years or so. And that Iran basically is now emboldened, not just to build nukes, but likely to use them - you do not have to fire off the nuke to cause all kinds of mayhem as North Korea has already demonstrated - against an impotent West. The Saudis are thus quite contempt to let the Jews do the hard and dirty work, then go to the UN and complain a bit – they need that show for the morons that live in the ME to continue to believe the propaganda that all their ills come from evil Jews, and not the fact that their cultures are dysfunctional and destructive – to save face. Let’s pray Israel does what the rest of the world should have, and saves us all from a real Armageddon. Not like they will ever get their kudos for doing it though
Posted by AlexinCT on 06/14/10 at 03:00 AM in Decline of Western Civilization Left Wing Idiocy The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Friday, June 11, 2010
The Mosque of the Red Death
About a month ago, a Community Board approved the construction of a 15-story mosque and Islamic cultural center near (not at) Ground Zero. The intent, according to its founders, is to help create a better relationship between Islam and the West. There was no objection to this until the 9/11 families got ahold of it. And now it’s provoking not just opposition, but obnoxiousness. During the last rally, the crowd turned on two Christian men because they were also Arabs.
Here’s the justification given:
While I can understand this point of view, I simply can’t harness the outrage that seems to be circling in some quarters over this. There seems to be a perception that this is, in some way, honoring the hijackers. Even if we assume that the attack somehow represent a religious statement (as opposed to just mindless bloodshed), there were many more Muslims murdered on 9/11 than there were doing the murdering. And if you look at the terrorist violence taking place all over the world, the primary victims are, in fact, Muslims living in Afghanistan and Iraq whom AQ and other organizations happily kill when they cooperate with the West, oppose radicalism, educate their daughters or just generally get in the way of the Islamist agenda. The typical Muslim is more likely to be a victim of a terrorist than a terrorist. And this is especially true of American Muslims. We have anywhere from 2-7 million Muslims in this country, only a tiny fraction of whom are even remotely involve with radicalism.
Moreover, what ever happened to that “they hate us for our freedoms” bit? Isn’t one of the freedoms they hate us for religious freedom? And the economic freedom to build whatever you want wherever you can afford to?
Look, Islam is not going anywhere. A key part of our strategy for mitigating the danger of terrorism has to involve supporting moderate Muslims against their radical counterparts. The message we need to be sending to the Islamic World has two parts—that we’re fine with moderate Islam, but we will destroy extremists. How is that message advance by trying to banish a mosque from anywhere within X miles of Ground Zero?
Posted by Hal_10000 on 06/11/10 at 06:12 AM in The Religion of Peace™ • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Wednesday, April 07, 2010
This one is for you Hal…
Guess what Hal? Obama has just done another thing I approve off. Props to the guy for ordering this:
There has to be a price for betraying your country and siding with the enemy. Obama’s and his team got this one right. Wish Bush had done something like this when he needed to. Sometimes this kind of violence is the best answer or choice in a whole range of shitty ones. I wonder how the MSM or the elft will feel about this though…
Posted by AlexinCT on 04/07/10 at 05:29 PM in Politics Law, & Economics The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Obama’s new non-nuclear and non-anti-Islamic radicalism policies..
I heard about Obama’s new nuclear policy a day or two ago, but decided to get more details before commenting on it. I should have gone with my first instincts and just pointed out then that this idiotic new policy was madness masquerading as progress. When even the usual MSM DNC talking point outlets like the NYT are asking if the new policy disarms America, you can bet that’s the end result, if not the end goal and plan, in the first place. Think about it. The people that have now decided America will literally take forever to decide on a response and get the options from lawyers, if they can respond to any WMD attacks in kind at all. These people and this new policy are completely undermining the MAD (mutually assured destruction) philosophy that have prevented a nuclear exchange by the powers that be, first during the Cold War with the USSR, and then in the new world that came after their inevitable fall. These are the same people that have vehemently objected to any and all US efforts to create some kind of missile defense, and have argued that it was because they firmly believe that if we got such a defensive system, it would undermine the MAD principle and lead to bad choices if not another arms race. But what they are pushing for is disarmament – that’s what the end game is, and Obama has made no bones about it – and whether they admit it or not, this policy has now have literally done away with the concept of MAD. WTF? In order to deter the use of WMDs from others - only stupid liberals live with the idiotic angst that it will be the evil US that will start Armageddon - we will now make our response to a WMD attack to not only be even more unclear, but now also limited? Again, WTF? Bye, bye MAD. No changes for defense, but changes that make us not just weaker, but invite attack, that’s progress!
And I almost broke out laughing when I read the part about how the new Obama policy, in response to a WMD attack, relies on an army of lawyers which will first go over the suspected nation that attacked us’ IAEA nuclear non-proliferation report, and then based on that report and their nuclear efforts & ambitions, decide if a nuclear reply was allowed. I don’t know if you caught the meaning of this move, but have no doubt that Obama’s new brainfart indirectly gave the UN control over not just our nuclear arsenal – which he is also hard at work obsoleting, but that’s a different story for a different day – but over our decisions to use them! All the IAEA has to do is whitewash their reports, and the US literally can’t use nuclear weapons on anyone. What’s the plan then? You are not going to try to make the case that the left will push for a conventional response to any WMD attack, are you? Look at their stances on Afghanistan and Iraq, and you will see that their first inclination, after they blame us for the attack, will be to urge “restraint”. These are the morons that tell you they believe violence never solved anything! Well, to be honest they don’t believe violence against anyone other than those that don’t share their ideology and hate of this country’s exceptionalism solves anything, because in my experience they tend to be the most violent people in defense of their twisted ideology. Can you think of anything more insane than these people now being in charge of life and death decisions and our security? What about the mindset that this policy puts those that would want to use WMDs against us, then? If you say this shift will do anything but encourage them more, you are a fool. We have just been made even more unsafe.
Oh yeah, the fact that Obama and his team of geniuses, directly or indirectly, excluded Iran and North Korea from this new policy, should matter a bit. Does anyone think that people like Obama that wanted to sit down and talk to a hostile Iran but threatened our Pakistani ally – I know they are an ally of convenience, but that’s neither here nor there, as much smarter men than I long ago pointed out that when it comes to nations and their interests are allies are just that – with nuclear hellfire, can be trusted to do what’s best for us? These are the same morons that want to lawyer up those gunning to kill us and rammed through a terribly unpopular government healthcare takeover that will hurt us all and bankrupt the country, after all. We are in great hands! The world has suddenly become a better place. I miss that “Cowboy”…
If I was Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, or any other nation that had lived under the promise of protection from the US nuclear umbrella, this new shift towards insanity would be a wake-up call. Don’t be surprised that these nations with North Korea and China in the mix, decide they can no longer trust us and decide to start up their own nuclear program. If anything, I suspect this new policy will not only backfire on us and weaken our security and the confidence of our allies, while emboldening our enemies, but it will lead to exactly the opposite of what these leftist morons are hoping for. Instead of others giving up their nukes or nuclear ambitions, this policy will force countless other nations that rightfully no longer trust us to provide for their security – we can’t even provide for our own – to go nuclear. I mentioned the Asian nations that would feel obliged to go nuclear, but that list is going to extend to many nations in the Middle East – I should point out that these nations were fine with an Israeli bomb and never felt the need for a nuke of their own – and likely also Europe and South America. And I am not even discussing the open door policy this invites on non-nuclear WMDs. If you really want to screw over the US use a bio or chemical weapon, keep the UN in your pocket and their report clean, and then make sure the US knows that any conventional response is going to be nary impossible or super costly, especially with weak spined collectivist twits in charge, resulting in a token use of force at best, and you score. Only people in fantasyland think this isn’t how the new policy will play out.
I also found it telling that this dangerous nuclear policy shift by the Obama Admin came in the same week that the WH has adopted a new policy that literally abandons the use of anti-radicalized Islam terminology. If you can’t define or name your enemy, how do you propose to fight, let alone defeat them? Do these morons think that if they stop pointing out that the terrorists and terror enabling nations at war with us are such, that they will cease and desist? Ostrich much? Or is it so they can broaden the terms to just terrorists and then bran Tea partiers as such as well? After all, the left has clearly shown they see more of a threat, when none really exists I should add, from those that disagree with their policies, than from radical and evil Islamic terrorists hell bent on blanketing the world in Sharia.
There is a pattern here with these drastic changes to things that these people when it is convenient for them claim are weakened when someone is making changes that would strengthen our security, and I am worried about what it says. I see no good coming from these decisions, which ultimately again bring us to the radical America hating left’s obsessive and stupid believe that the problem is the US, and if it just exposed its jugular to the world’s predators, they would all suddenly learn to live in peace with us. This kind of thinking is insanity, and yet these are the people we now put in charge of our security. We can’t call the enemy what it is, and we are bending over backwards to ease the faux concerns of people that would like nothing more than a crack at crippling and destroying us if they but could get away with it. I guess we deserve the consequences of these dumb moves.Close this post...
Posted by AlexinCT on 04/07/10 at 08:01 AM in Decline of Western Civilization Deep Thoughts Left Wing Idiocy The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Miss me yet???
Just after one year of “Hope and Change” it looks like people are wising up that they got sold the same bill of loser collectivist goods of the Carter years, and pining for those bad days they told us we had when republicans were in charge. As reality clashes with fantasy and things like this, this, this, this, this, this, and this keep happening, the democrats continue to pretend that what people want is bigger government, a complete takeover of healthcare - 1/5th of the economy - by that big government, and a massive migration from jobs in the private sector to a fraction of the number of jobs lost there in the public sector. And that doesn’t tackle the complete collapse of the AGW scam which wanted to expand the government take over globally and other such stupid ideas. At least Clinton was smart enough to be saved by a republican takeover of congress in 2004. I doubt Obama, a true believer, will be able to make the same connections. After all, he was told he was the messiah and could walk on water.
As I said before, a few years of the democrats in power would be enough to make many see the light. I just didn’t think it could take but one year for that to happen. I could not believe that the democrats were really this inept and stupid, but they are hard at work proving me both right and wrong. Democrats are good at manipulating the news, with help of the complicit MSM, to attack their opponents when they are in power. Unfortunately now that they are in power, even with massive help covering up for them by the MSM, they can’t hide how inept they are. Reality has a way of destroying most collectivist fantasies, and what is happening isn’t anything new. The fun thing is that I get to bring out my latest find, a poster on some highway in the Mid West that tells the story better than anything else:
Give it time. The numbers are getting bigger and bigger, and all but the most hard core leftists are agreeing that for all his faults, and he had them believe me, Bush was heads and shoulders a better president than the current community organizer in chief….
Posted by AlexinCT on 02/10/10 at 07:10 AM in Elections Europe and the UK Fun and Humor Health Care Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics Polls and Surveys Science and Technology The Press Machine The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Thursday, January 07, 2010
Pass the buck…
I hope the people at USA Today were being ironic when they put up this article about how Americans are going to be shocked by this whole sordid underwear bomber affair. The shock I experienced was at this quote from Obama:
WTF? Obama and his team that had been handpicked precisely so they could put terrorism on the back burner and go back to the days of pretending this was not a problem, now wants to make like there is a problem? Let me ask again: WTF? The decision to minimize the terror threat - and I should also add shifting the focus to their political opposition by making it policy to look harder at dissatisfied conservatives, which Janet Napolitano and crew called more dangerous than the Islamic radicals - was a conscious and deliberate move by this administration, starting right with the president that belongs to the party that has been campaigning on the fact that fighting terrorism was creating more terrorism!
In fact, they did not stop there. This WH has actively, directly and indirectly attacked everyone that followed Bush era policies intended to actually prevent terror attacks. What the moonbats and the MSM fail to realize or report, be it on purpose or simply because of ideological stupidity, is that it was not a coincidence that during the Bush years we had no more attacks after 9-11. The SOP then was to treat these people as serious threats: we were at war. The left demonized Bush for doing that too. When the donkeys won and decided to sideline Islamic terrorism – people opposing Obama and the left’s agenda were the only real terrorists worth bothering about - and again make it just your average run of the mill criminal activity, what did they expect to happen? That the terrorist would quit in sympathy? What did they think their campaign to demonize and punish the people that had taken the Bush era orders and directives to prevent more terror attacks – like their campaign to go after the CIA for actually once doing what it took to stop attacks – and use them to take a poke at the top members of the Bush administration would lead to? I don’t if it takes a genius to figure it out, and don’t know about you, but if my new boss tries to punish me for diligently & effectively following orders of given by my old boss, orders that actually worked and matter, I think my attitude will simply become to avoid doing anything and everything that might be then used against me. That’s human nature. So you will pardon me for not wanting to give Obama a pass now that he and his team say that there was a problem connecting the dots? SHYA!
These idiots don’t get it. They can not have it both ways. If you do not take this threat seriously and deal with it as such, if your politically motivated efforts to score cheap points against your predecessor with your lunatic base obviously will result in problems but you still go ahead with it, and more importantly, if you continue to try and pretend that just because you have decided to stop dealing with these people that have declared war on us as such, don’t act surprised when they not only come at you harder and more frequently. And please don’t pretend it is not your fault. We got lucky. This bastard was stopped. Sooner than later however, especially with the current attitude towards the war against these terrorists and radicals, one of these twisted monsters will get lucky and people will die.
But don’t worry. They have a plan.
Yeah, I am sure this will work. These government bureaucrats are so good with lists. Treating this threat with the seriousness it deserves and actually acknowledging the left is damned wrong about the way it approaches this entire issue, for pure political reasons nevertheless, is not going to happen. Don’t thus be surprised when we get more of the same. So far it does look like the terrorists sure love the Obama presidency just like the left promised us the world would.
Posted by AlexinCT on 01/07/10 at 06:18 AM in Left Wing Idiocy The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Almost funny to watch these people make excuses…
I have often told liberals that the greatest vindication of the Bush policies would come from the next elected democrat doing more of the same and the left suddenly twisting itself into pretzels justifying that, and it has not even been a full year yet since Bush left that these tools are not letting me down.
Literally, you can condense the pile of manure and twisting in this Time article’s opening statement into: Blame Bush for Obama having to do more of the same! The rest of the article is replete with more excuse making for why Obama is now forced to not just follow Bush policies, but expand on the ones that irked the left the most when Bush was doing them. From Iraq – which we have now won despite the stupid left’s enormous campaign to declare it a loss (and accompanying actions to make it so) - to Afghanistan, which the Obama administration labeled the only “just war” right before it found itself desperately seeking for excuses to cut & run (like I predicted Afghanistan was just an excuse for the anti-US crowd to hide behind while attacking the Iraqi war, and despite all the blather would be abandoned just as quick as they could as the idiotic authors pathetic attempt to actually make the case for less action in Afghanistan clearly proves), the Obama Administration is doing more of the same that Bush did. In fact Obama is now realizing that despite his most fervent desire to bail on Afghanistan, that doing so will have consequences that will definitely affect his desire for a second term in office. I find the lack of a mention of the situation with Pakistan quite telling too.
Then we have Iran and North Korea. All that bull about how Obama would bridge the gap and engage Iran is now proving to be meaningless. As those of us grounded in reality have pointed out repeatedly: the sanctions road is a dead end doomed to failure. Of course the response from the Obama Administration, as this Time article points out, is to threaten more sanctions. I am sure the angry letters are producing a lot of hilarity in the Mullocracy’s discussion chambers. These guys must thank Allah every passing day for the democrats and Obama. I am sure Kim is also doing the Lambada in joy that he has the Obama team playing hard ball with em.
Obama’s reset with Russia and the policy towards China, despite the dig from Time trying to paint the Bush decisions negatively, have gone even further in that direction. Of course the tards at Time do not see any problem attacking Bush for that but giving Obama a pass. The stuff they write on the Israeli & Palestinian situation is just as stupid. At least Bush didn’t backstab an ally like Obama did. Then again, Obama has also pissed off and dissed Britain, France, and many other allies other than Israel, while all but dropping to his knees to service those with hostile intentions towards us. Funny that Time chose not to mention any of that too.
That finally brings us to al Qaeda, and more telling, the lack of any mention of Gitmo. What a coincidence that Time chose to ignore that, huh? That Christmas airplane bomb plot served the Obama administration – which was hell bent, and still seems to be so, on returning to the pre-9-11 days of treating terrorists as just common criminals – a healthy dose of reality. As they and the media spin the complete failure of the system the Obamanauts now are in charge of, try to ignore that the only reason this plane did not go down was the courageous actions of an alert individual, and work diligently to straddle us with more punitive and useless regulations and procedures that will have zero impact on security, those of us that are not insane again get a warning that the enemy means business.
Don’t worry. People will soon be figuring out that the left and the media did a massive injustice to the Bush administration – and I am not making excuses for them because Bush certainly was no conservative and the way he allowed first his own party members and then democrats after 2006 to shirk fiscal responsibility should forever stain his presidency – as the Obama years drag on. I am willing to bet that Bush will one day be lauded as a fiscal conservative when compared to the disaster we are currently experiencing under the collectivist’s reign.Close this post...
Posted by AlexinCT on 01/06/10 at 05:57 AM in Health Care Left Wing Idiocy Politics Law, & Economics The Press Machine The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
Why have we not gotten more of this? Seriously. Our media and the leftists and their PC society are going to get more of us killed. This is unbelievable stuff.
I am serious if something like this happened to me on a plane I would sue the authorities involved for negligence.Close this post...
Posted by AlexinCT on 12/02/09 at 09:05 AM in The Press Machine The Religion of Peace™ War on Terror/Axis of Evil • (0) Trackbacks • Permalink •
Who's Logged In
Total Members: 27587
Links and Info
The ACLU and Terry Jones
Most recent entries
This page has been viewed 42341538 times