Right Thinking From The Left Coast
Adventure is worthwhile - Aesop

Here’s what the AGW cult’s priesthood has in store for us..

Forget the irony that these bastards took nice big airplanes to one of the world’s most popular vacation spots to spend 2 weeks living it up at one or another tax payer’s expense, and focus on what they really want to do to us:

Global warming is now such a serious threat to mankind that climate change experts are calling for Second World War-style rationing in rich countries to bring down carbon emissions.

In a series of papers published by the Royal Society, physicists and chemists from some of world’s most respected scientific institutions, including Oxford University and the Met Office, agreed that current plans to tackle global warming are not enough.

Unless emissions are reduced dramatically in the next ten years the world is set to see temperatures rise by more than 4C (7.2F) by as early as the 2060s, causing floods, droughts and mass migration.

As the world meets in Cancun, Mexico for the latest round of United Nations talks on climate change, the influential academics called for much tougher measures to cut carbon emissions.

We should thank them for their candidness. The wild lies about eco-Armageddon run rampant, as the desperation caused by more and more people seeing these elitist scumbags and their vile plan to create a crisis to then force the sheep to go along with their tyrannical power grab, seem to be running rampant. At least they are being honest about the end goal: to ration energy, and through that rationing, control people, at lest for now, in the West. Of course, as their nice luxurious trip to Cancun to spend a nice 2 weeks in the sun proves, they expect this to apply to us peasants, but not to them, our betters.

Posted by AlexinCT on 11/29/10 at 07:23 AM (Discuss this in the forums)

Comments


Posted by on 11/29/10 at 05:52 PM from United States

Cancun may be the only venue they could find that they had a reasonable assurance that Al Gore’s presence wasn’t going to result in a blizzard....

Posted by on 11/29/10 at 06:05 PM from United States

Unless emissions are reduced dramatically in the next ten years the world is set to see temperatures rise by more than 4C (7.2F) by as early as the 2060s, causing floods, droughts and mass migration

Uhhh wasn’t that the same line used in the mid 1990s?  If we dont act in the next 7-10 years it will be too late!!!

When do we get to hold them to this?  In 2020 I want to be able to say “Look here, Mr Enviroweenie, you said if we haven’t acted by 2020 it would be too late, we haven’t acted, so will you please just shut up now?”

Posted by InsipiD on 11/29/10 at 07:25 PM from United States

Unless emissions are reduced dramatically in the next ten years the world is set to see temperatures rise by more than 4C (7.2F) by as early as the 2060s, causing floods, droughts and mass migration.

Pure BS.  I’ve never seen a figure anywhere close to that number put forward.

Posted by on 11/30/10 at 12:38 AM from United States

Yeah cus you’re smarter than the physicist and chemist from the Royal Society. What’s it like being a creationist, anti-science, anti-intellectual numb nut? Can you describe that to us so we might better understand the position you’re in?

<< Back to main